Re: [dvd::rip] dvd::rip 0.97.1 - Notes to package maintainers

[Jörn Reder <joern@xxxxxx>]

Christian Marillat wrote:

> > I forgot to mention that we should try to get a consistent naming for 
> > the packages, in particular because it's not recommended to just replace
> > the old stable with the new unstable package without renaming it.
> 
> But both packages can't be installed at the same time.

That's true, correspondent "conflicts" fields need to be set. But I hope
nobody really *wants* to downgrade again ;)

> > E.g. dvdrip-unstable (or video-dvdrip-unstable), although I'd prefer the
> > first.
> >
> > Any comments?
> 
> Yes, this is problematic for Debian with testing and unstable
> branchs. Mais be I can add an experimental branch ?

Hmm, don't know whether I understand you correctly... Do you mean having
an application marked "unstable" in testing is confusing?

> Users comments are welcome.

Of course... ;)

Jörn

-- 
sub i($){print$_[0]}*j=*ENV;sub w($){sleep$_[0]}sub _($){i"$p:$c> ",w+01
,$_=$_[0],tr;i-za-h,;a-hi-z ;,i$_,w+01,i"\n"}$|=1;$f='HO';($c=$j{PWD})=~
s+$j{$f."ME"}+~+;$p.="$j{USER}\@".`hostname`;chop$p;_"kl",$c='~',_"zu,".
"-zn,*",_"#,epg,lw,gwc,mfmkcbm,cvsvwev,uiqt,kwvbmvb?",i"$p:$c> ";w+1<<07

pgp00029.pgp
Description: PGP signature