dvd::rip

->ABOUT / NEWS

->DOCUMENTATION
-TABLE OF CONTENTS
-INSTALLATION
-USING THE GUI
-CLUSTER MODE
-FAQ

->KEY FEATURES

->DOWNLOAD

->SUPPORT

->TRANSLATIONS

->MAILING LIST
-SEARCH ARCHIVE

->CHANGE LOG

->CREDITS

->TODO

->LINKS

http://www.exit1.org/


Re: [dvd::rip] Re: Deinterlacing

Subject: Re: [dvd::rip] Re: Deinterlacing
From: Sylvain <alivarys_dubyran@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:24:27 +0200


Sunny wrote:
On 7/25/05, Sylvain <alivarys_dubyran@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
  
 Dvdrip offers several options.  It seems that "zoom to full frame" gives
the best results, but is real CPU intensive (gives me about 30% of the
transcoding speed I get when I do nothing to nothing, but I use it anyway
because the results are really good), while "interpolate scan lines" is the
fastest alternative (more than twice as fast as the previous one, I use it
when ripping trailers from my dvds), but I haven't really investigated on
the matter.
 Have fun
 Sylvain
    

Do you have any opinion for smart deiterlacing?
nope, sorry.  I've used it sometimes, but when I rip a movie, I want a *real* good result, and when I want to rip something fast, I want to rip it *real* fast :)
anyway, I'll try it on something and let you know.
It halves the speed if
I use it. I never used the zoom to full frame, so it'll be nice if
someone can comment what's better. The speed is not so critical after
all :)
er... ripping a movie without deinterlacing anything takes at least 4 hours on my machine, and when I deinterlace with "zoom to full frame" it can take more than 14 hours if the film is long or if I do something else in the same time.
So yes, speed matters sometimes :)
 

Archive powered by MHonArc. Search powered by ht://dig.

[ top ]