Re: [dvd::rip] Re: Deinterlacing
|
Subject: |
Re: [dvd::rip] Re: Deinterlacing |
|
From: |
Sylvain <alivarys_dubyran@xxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:24:27 +0200 |
Sunny wrote:
On 7/25/05, Sylvain <alivarys_dubyran@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dvdrip offers several options. It seems that "zoom to full frame" gives
the best results, but is real CPU intensive (gives me about 30% of the
transcoding speed I get when I do nothing to nothing, but I use it anyway
because the results are really good), while "interpolate scan lines" is the
fastest alternative (more than twice as fast as the previous one, I use it
when ripping trailers from my dvds), but I haven't really investigated on
the matter.
Have fun
Sylvain
Do you have any opinion for smart deiterlacing?
nope, sorry. I've used it sometimes, but when I rip a movie, I want a
*real* good result, and when I want to rip something fast, I want to
rip it *real* fast :)
anyway, I'll try it on something and let you know.
It halves the speed if
I use it. I never used the zoom to full frame, so it'll be nice if
someone can comment what's better. The speed is not so critical after
all :)
er... ripping a movie without deinterlacing anything takes at least 4
hours on my machine, and when I deinterlace with "zoom to full frame"
it can take more than 14 hours if the film is long or if I do something
else in the same time.
So yes, speed matters sometimes :)
|
|
|