On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 08:33:57PM +0100, Philip Corner wrote:
>
> > But why does deinterlacing highly increase encoding time while mplayer
> > can deinterlace in realtime with even better results?
> I was thinking about this. It must be because mplayer and Xine use the
> graphics card to do this partially in hardware. The hardware will also do the
> image scaling. Jörn, would it be possible to use mplayer or Xine to decode
> the video, and perform the de-interlacing and scaling (almost for "free"),
> and then use transcode to do the encoding. This should provide a massive
> speed boost.
There is another tools to enconde videos: mencoder, which is used by mplayer.
There are some GUI using mencoder instead of transcode. I would like to know
more about the diferences between both. If some of you have done tests please
report.
Iván.
|
DOCUMENTATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS